Advances In Understanding Brain Circuits Responsible For Tics I…
Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Iceman wrote: > On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:46:12 -0800, Linda wrote: > > Path: nwrddc03.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net! wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!216.196.98.144!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!bor der1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!n ntpserver.com!sam.nntpserver.com.POSTED!c1fae7a2!not-for-mail > > From: Linda <Li…@nospam.com> > > Newsgroups: alt.support.tourette > > Subject: Re: Advances In Understanding Brain Circuits Responsible For Tics I… > > Reply-To: Li…@nospam.com > > Message-ID: <vbjjo0losifjsuapuf3a5rj7djbneov…@4ax.com> > > References: <dehho055o4rp6d6f3d51q2ce22eh83a…@4ax.com> <1502-4189146F…@storefull-3254.bay.webtv.net> > > X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 > > X-No-Archive: yes > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Lines: 135 > > Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:46:12 -0800 > > NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.198.23.183 > > X-Trace: sam.nntpserver.com 1099558339 172.198.23.183 (Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:52:19 EST) > > NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:52:19 EST > > Xref: cyclone1.gnilink.net alt.support.tourette:40727 > > X-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 03:52:22 EST (nwrddc03.gnilink.net) > > ————————————– > > WARNING: The livlihood, physical health and lives of > > alt.support.tourette posters, their spouses and/or minor children is > > being intentionally endangered by the group cyberstalking, > > cyberharassment, and libel being engaged in against AST subscribers by > > a ring of rogue psychotherapists and supplicants whose serial > > cyberterrorism of private citizens continues to go on and on and on, > > years after prior targets have complained about this ring’s > > cyberterrorizing private citizens to both the APA and law enforcement > > agencies. > > http://www.fireflysun.com/book/SPPstalking.php > > d by the strept germ is why Dr. Freeman gets pissed off when > > tourettes is diagnosed in kids with vulnernability to strept germs. > > I > > ettes was a chorea or not, what tourettes etiology was, and what > > it’s features are…made tourettes something wasn’t diagnosed very > > often until the late 1970’s. > > gnosed very often > > I believe medical doctors used to only refer people for psych > > evaluations when the doctor couldn’t find any medical condition > > causing the symptoms. > > cause psych diseases used to be one’s where a person suffered > > neuro-psych symptoms from no KNOWN cuase…so it was said to be in > > their head. > > Nowadays….it seems like the psych profession has gained primacy over > > the medical profession…and they are diagnosing disease as being in > > the head without even looking for organic diseases. > > Hence…the ascendancy of tourettes syndrome… > > es to fight off the strept germs —–messing up the brain for a > > while….but those are supposed to be self-limiting.
Response:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:46:12 -0800, Linda <Li…@nospam.com> wrote: >On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:25:03 -0500, SOan…@webtv.net wrote: >>Linda I read the whole thing but most of it is not in lay language.. >Having lived long enuff to have steeped myself in a number of >different cultural mileiu’s which all have their own "slang" or >"verbiage" or language….I view neuroanatomists lingo as yet >another cultural mileis "lingo" or verbiage for me to pick up and >learn as i go along….albeit latin "verbiage"…
Holy crapola, Linda. The first post talked about difficult language and then look at the unintelligible blather you threw in! Geez! Your empathy is astounding. And your writing style, well … well … Not much nice to say there, is there? Can’t you use either correct grammar and language or shut up? … – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->No, but I’m a lay person and my knowledge of neuro conditions is >limited to what I haved picked up reading literature for lay people >about all the conditions people in my immediate social circle have. >It’s my understanding that "St. Vitus Dance" is the old fashioned >name for Sydenham chorea. >It’s my understanding SVD or Sydenham chorea is dx’d when involuntary >movements manifest in the months following a bout of rheumatic fever >(strept infection). >If you had rheumatic fever as a child, followed by a movement >disorder they have dx’d you with St. Vitus dance. >I don’t know how true it is….but the theory regarding SVD or >Syndeham’s chorea is that the antibodies the body produces to kill the >strept germ are one’s attack certain brain cells.
Another of your junior high reports. This time you forgot to list your single reference: Encarta. You read a quicky article in an online encyclopedia, then try to present it as if you alread knew it. That’s dumb, and lame. Outs you as a bitch. Can’t you just converse, share real experiences, and not try to look like the expert on every newsgroup you frequent? Every newsgroup, you do the same thing. Pretty sad, isn’t it, that you can’t be real, or genuine, or anything with real contact between people? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->But, SVD is a self-limiting disease—and person generally fully >recover. >Of, course—if they get another strept infection—the antibodies >will get produced again, so they could suffer a reocurrence of the >movement disorder. >Some doctors will prescribe anti-biotics prophalactically…(small >dosage) to prevent such people from having a re-occurence of >Syndenham’s. >It’s interesting that your involuntary movements were diagnosed as >being owing to a chorea as a child, then as being owing to tourettes >so many years later. >Do your involuntary movements today and the one’s 80 years ago have >the same cause, I wonder? >Or, were your involuntary movements diagnosed as SVD in the 20’s >because SVD was the diagnostic label that was popular then, and >diagnosed as Tourettes today…cause that is the diagnostic label >popular for movement disorders today? >Does it matter? >so long as you found the clonidine relieves your involuntary >movements..I don’t suspect it matters to you what diagnostic label >they are given as being symptoms of?
Response:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:02:55 -0800, LInda <Li…@nospam.com> wrote: >Advances In Understanding Brain Circuits Responsible For Tics In >Tourette’s Shed Light On Disorder >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/10/041030133244.htm >Recent advances are producing a much greater understanding of the >brain circuits responsible for the tics and problem behaviors seen in >Tourette’s syndrome. >In one groundbreaking study, investigators have for the first time >measured the number of neurons in a particular area of the basal
I’ve been away for a few days, and you have obviously been busy, Linda sweetums. Not intelligent, certainly not productive, but busy. I am sooooo sorry that I have neglected you lately, Linda. Now I am back my lovely little thing, and you have all my attention now. (He bats his eyes.) It never ceases to amaze me how fukkin stupid you are, Linda Gore. You keep posting crap like this when you don’t have any ability to read and understand it. I’m no psychologist, but I do know my statistics, and the statistics in the article you abstracted (just like the one you posted a day earlier) are pathetic and do not demonstrate a meaningful difference. Psychologists don’t use the Omega squared statistic very often, but it is useful and it shows that little of the group difference is accounted for by the difference between Tourette’s and other subjects. Read and undestand first, dumb ass! Slitch. Fyre
Response:
Linda I don’t remember having tics only a lot of blinking. Out side of childhood deceases I have been healthy all my life. Almost 90 and still live alone and do all my own cooking, a vegetarian & cleaning. I have a very nice social life and keep active. Fay
Response:
"Iceman" <1c3…@chi-mafia.org> wrote in message
news:f6781vuom6mv$.dlg@icepick.org… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 05:02:31 GMT, Pablo wrote: >> "Iceman" <1c3…@chi-mafia.org> wrote in message >> news:p00xwpf32090$.dlg@icepick.org… >>> On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 03:38:18 GMT, Noon Cat Nick wrote: >>>> Iceman wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:42:07 GMT, Noon Cat Nick wrote: >>>>>> Iceman wrote: >>>>>> <nothing original> >>>>>> Okay, so what’s your problem with it? >>>>> Why do you assume there is a problem? >>>> Oh, my mistake. You agree with every word. "Kook notes" must be your >>>> cup >>>> of tea. >>> I have not a clue what you are talking about. The message was archived >>> simply because she posted more than she intended to, it gives others a >>> chance to see how she operates. >>> It had absolutely nothing to do with "problem/no problem". >>> Most peeps recognize her for what she is. >> Agreed. And she hasn’t stopped for quite awhile >> Here’s another one. It’s sort of in the middle of her post. It shows >> her >> kooknotes wherein she states she "applied for work and was turned >> down because of untrue BS [I] posted." Given that it was left in the >> post, >> I consider it "publication" in a legal sense. >> I’ve told her and told her to clean up her posts, but she has done it yet >> again. >> From over TWO years ago, Linda wrote: > <snipped> > Well it certainly doesn’t take much to see that the cause of her body > imploding is due to her psychological problems. If she does keep copies of > all that she says she does then her "evidence" would end up putting her in > a treatment program. One she sorely needs.
Yep, her own records would do her in. Linda has said being on usenet is not good for her health. We are seeing this. Pablo
Response:
"Iceman" <1c3…@chi-mafia.org> wrote in message
news:p00xwpf32090$.dlg@icepick.org… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 03:38:18 GMT, Noon Cat Nick wrote: >> Iceman wrote: >>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:42:07 GMT, Noon Cat Nick wrote: >>>> Iceman wrote: >>>> <nothing original> >>>> Okay, so what’s your problem with it? >>> Why do you assume there is a problem? >> Oh, my mistake. You agree with every word. "Kook notes" must be your cup >> of tea. > I have not a clue what you are talking about. The message was archived > simply because she posted more than she intended to, it gives others a > chance to see how she operates. > It had absolutely nothing to do with "problem/no problem". > Most peeps recognize her for what she is.
Agreed. And she hasn’t stopped for quite awhile Here’s another one. It’s sort of in the middle of her post. It shows her kooknotes wherein she states she "applied for work and was turned down because of untrue BS [I] posted." Given that it was left in the post, I consider it "publication" in a legal sense. I’ve told her and told her to clean up her posts, but she has done it yet again. From over TWO years ago, Linda wrote: From: SnowWhite (WhiteQu…@Nospam.com) Subject: Re: The days of anonymous email services are numbered alt.support.depression.medication 02-05 23:13:16 PST View: Complete Thread (50 articles) | Original Format Pablo <n…@yes.com> wrote in message
news:a3pdcd$d3e$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> SnowWhite wrote in message … > >Pablo <n…@yes.com> wrote in message > >news:a3nvei$tn$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net… > >> SnowWhite wrote in message … > >> >Pablo will have to cease posting when that occurs… > >> >YEAH! > >> I don’t use an anonymous email service. I use an invalid email address > >> so > >> that I am not bothered by pests. People who need to get in touch with > >> me > >> still manage to do so. > >> Sorry if this mars your mood. > >Outlawing anonymous email boxes is only the first step. > > its only a matter of time…anonymous cowards abusing innocent people on > >usenet will not be permitted to do so anonymously..because of incidents > >like on ASH, and in the russian and korean groups. and > >…………..HERE! > >Its is what I joined the PAC to bring about! > Sounds like you and your PAC pals have control issues.
changing the subject, which is anonymous cowards libeling posters on usenet, and getting legislation so their victims may hold them who libel others legally acocountable for having done so.. (Pablo’s crossposting trimmed! ) . I intend to make sure people can sue others for libeling them with psychiatric dx’d they do not suffer. I have posts of yours and every single person on ASD-med who has slandered, defamed and libeled me posting FALSELY I suffer from illnesses I do not. The damage done me is very clear. Now, how to make those doing the damage accountable? sprrvewith arandwith roMy efYou have posted vile slander and libel about me. I have letters from my doctors ptaken letteI applied for work and was turned down because of untrue BS you posted. nw want to take legal action. slaIt has to do with the fact that people like yourself have posted vile slander, and libel about me by name, while you hide behind an anonmymous nym and cannot be made legally ato yono defamedr post vile slander, defame, and libel others while hiding behind anonymous bacNo I am being slandered, defamed and libeled by persons such as yourself. And,I believe I have the right to know who posts such libel so I can legally redress it.d de – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> >> >spacebar <EatMyS…@shaw.ca> wrote in message > >> >news:31578.14940$cy1.687307@news1.calgary.shaw.ca… > >> >> <.> wrote in message news:u5pcti46b0atb2@corp.supernews.com… > >> >> > February 2nd, 2002 > >> >> > Email took center stage this week in the technology world with new > >> >> > initiatives aimed at stopping spam and PCWorld.com reports on the > >> >> > rising costs of "free" email services. > >> >> > There was also a very dark side to the email story this week. CNN > >> >> > covered a taped rant from Osama bin Laden, made in October, in > >> >> > which > >> >> > he mocks the U.S. government for believing (he thinks) that > >> >> > terrorists > >> >> > aren’t smart enough to use email and other modern communications. > >> >> > Of > >> >> > course we all know that terrorists use email. The latest example > >> >> > is > >> >> > the criminals who kidnapped Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel > >> >> > Pearl > >> >> > and used anonymous email services to send their threats to news > >> >> > organizations. > >> >> > Here is a prediction: before the year is out there will be a major > >> >> > push inside the federal law enforcement community to make email > >> >> > far > >> >> > easier to trace. There will be plenty of resistance, but I believe > >> >> > that the days of anonymous email services are numbered. > >> >> > Ramon G. McLeod > >> >> > Executive Editor for News
Response:
Linda I read the whole thing but most of it is not in lay language.. I did go to a Ts specialist and he said I had TS but never to a person 89. then I remembered my mother taking me out of 5 grade to go in a special class. I asked why and she said I had St. Vitas Dance. this was in the early 20. I understand that it was TS but it was an old fashioned way of saying T S. The Dr. said it was a case to write up about. I go back to him next mo. and after taking Clonidine I have improved 99% All through my married life & raising 3 children being normal it came back in my 80. Have you ever heard of this happening? Fay
Response:
Iceman wrote:
<nothing original> Okay, so what’s your problem with it?
Response:
What does that mean, and what are you saying about Dr. Freeman ??? [ Not to be confused with other recent ast Linda nyms: "Adinl" <Ad...@nospam.com> adinlli...@aol.com (Adinllinda) getnstron...@hotmail.com (Linda) Linda <li...@om.nspmcom> "Linda" <Li...@noemail.com> "Linda" <Li...@nospam.com> LInda <Li...@nospam.com> Linda <Li...@nospam.comnojunk> "Linda" <li...@nozpam.com> Li...@nspam.comnojunk "Linda" <li...@y.comnojunk> Linda <Li...@zom.nspmcom> "Linda" <nos...@nospam.com> lindaglasve...@aol.comnojunk (Linda) tiffanyatt...@aol.com (Tiffanyattrop) ] – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Linda <Li…@nospam.com> wrote: > d by the strept germ is why Dr. Freeman gets pissed off when > tourettes is diagnosed in kids with vulnernability to strept germs. > I > ettes was a chorea or not, what tourettes etiology was, and what > it’s features are…made tourettes something wasn’t diagnosed very > often until the late 1970’s. > gnosed very often > I believe medical doctors used to only refer people for psych > evaluations when the doctor couldn’t find any medical condition > causing the symptoms. > cause psych diseases used to be one’s where a person suffered > neuro-psych symptoms from no KNOWN cuase…so it was said to be in > their head. > Nowadays….it seems like the psych profession has gained primacy over > the medical profession…and they are diagnosing disease as being in > the head without even looking for organic diseases. > Hence…the ascendancy of tourettes syndrome… > es to fight off the strept germs —–messing up the brain for a > while….but those are supposed to be self-limiting.
Response:
Iceman wrote: > On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:42:07 GMT, Noon Cat Nick wrote: > > Iceman wrote: > > <nothing original> > > Okay, so what’s your problem with it? > Why do you assume there is a problem?
Oh, my mistake. You agree with every word. "Kook notes" must be your cup of tea.
Response:
Linda, I have never had anything but childhood deceases. with 4 siblings we all had them. Thanks for your info. Fay
Response:
"Linda" <Li…@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vbjjo0losifjsuapuf3a5rj7djbneov0b5@4ax.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:25:03 -0500, SOan…@webtv.net wrote: >>Linda I read the whole thing but most of it is not in lay language.. > Having lived long enuff to have steeped myself in a number of > different cultural mileiu’s which all have their own "slang" or > "verbiage" or language….I view neuroanatomists lingo as yet > another cultural mileis "lingo" or verbiage for me to pick up and > learn as i go along….albeit latin "verbiage"… >> I did go to a Ts specialist and he said I had TS but never to a person >>89. then I remembered my mother taking me out of 5 grade to go in a >>special class. I asked why and she said I had St. Vitas Dance. this was >>in the early 20. I understand that it was TS but it was an old fashioned >>way of saying T S. The Dr. said it was a case to write up about. I go >>back to him next mo. and after taking Clonidine I have improved 99% >>All through my married life & raising 3 children being normal it came >>back in my 80. >>Have you ever heard of this happening? > No, but I’m a lay person and my knowledge of neuro conditions is > limited to what I haved picked up reading literature for lay people > about all the conditions people in my immediate social circle have. > It’s my understanding that "St. Vitus Dance" is the old fashioned > name for Sydenham chorea. > It’s my understanding SVD or Sydenham chorea is dx’d when involuntary > movements manifest in the months following a bout of rheumatic fever > (strept infection). > If you had rheumatic fever as a child, followed by a movement > disorder they have dx’d you with St. Vitus dance. > I don’t know how true it is….but the theory regarding SVD or > Syndeham’s chorea is that the antibodies the body produces to kill the > strept germ are one’s attack certain brain cells. > But, SVD is a self-limiting disease—and person generally fully > recover. > Of, course—if they get another strept infection—the antibodies > will get produced again, so they could suffer a reocurrence of the > movement disorder. > Some doctors will prescribe anti-biotics prophalactically…(small > dosage) to prevent such people from having a re-occurence of > Syndenham’s. > It’s interesting that your involuntary movements were diagnosed as > being owing to a chorea as a child, then as being owing to tourettes > so many years later. > Do your involuntary movements today and the one’s 80 years ago have > the same cause, I wonder? > Or, were your involuntary movements diagnosed as SVD in the 20’s > because SVD was the diagnostic label that was popular then, and > diagnosed as Tourettes today…cause that is the diagnostic label > popular for movement disorders today? > Does it matter? > so long as you found the clonidine relieves your involuntary > movements..I don’t suspect it matters to you what diagnostic label > they are given as being symptoms of? > ————————————– > WARNING: The livlihood, physical health and lives of > alt.support.tourette posters, their spouses and/or minor children is > being intentionally endangered by the group cyberstalking, > cyberharassment, and libel being engaged in against AST subscribers by > a ring of rogue psychotherapists and supplicants whose serial > cyberterrorism of private citizens continues to go on and on and on, > years after prior targets have complained about this ring’s > cyberterrorizing private citizens to both the APA and law enforcement > agencies. > http://www.fireflysun.com/book/SPPstalking.php > d by the strept germ is why Dr. Freeman gets pissed off when > tourettes is diagnosed in kids with vulnernability to strept germs. > I > ettes was a chorea or not, what tourettes etiology was, and what > it’s features are…made tourettes something wasn’t diagnosed very > often until the late 1970’s. > gnosed very often > I believe medical doctors used to only refer people for psych > evaluations when the doctor couldn’t find any medical condition > causing the symptoms. > cause psych diseases used to be one’s where a person suffered > neuro-psych symptoms from no KNOWN cuase…so it was said to be in > their head. > Nowadays….it seems like the psych profession has gained primacy over > the medical profession…and they are diagnosing disease as being in > the head without even looking for organic diseases. > Hence…the ascendancy of tourettes syndrome… > es to fight off the strept germs —–messing up the brain for a > while….but those are supposed to be self-limiting.
Hahahaahah! Linda, WHEN are you going to learn to edit your posts before sending them? This is not the first time you have gotten in trouble by leaving in troubling statements dangling at the ends of posts. This is how you accused me of causing you to lose a job opportunity, remember? Or do you leave it intentionally? Maybe you’ll blame it on some disorder. Pablo
