All Star Gal/Linda G
Question:
Joe Parsons wrote: > You have made serious accusations–now either substantiate them, retract them > with an apology, or reveal to this portion of the Usenet community just how > dishonest and unethical you really are.
She also recently made the serious accusation that I had "stalked her onto ASAD", even though I’ve followed and participated in asa-d just about as long as I have ast … she seems to treat serious accusations very casually. — Tourette Syndrome – Now What? http://tourettenowwhat.tripod.com
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->ubject: Re: All Star Gal/Linda G >From: TSNW t…@optonline.net >Date: 4/29/2003 8:30 AM Pacific Standard Time >Message-id: <3EAE9A78.BEF5C…@optonline.net> >Joe Parsons wrote: >> You have made serious accusations–now either substantiate them, retract >them >> with an apology, or reveal to this portion of the Usenet community just how >> dishonest and unethical you really are. >She also recently made the serious accusation that I had "stalked her >onto ASAD", even though I’ve followed and participated in asa-d just >about as long as I have ast … she seems to treat serious accusations >very casually.
Stalking/harassment of people is a serious problem, and one everyone needs to take seriously, since the overwhelming majority of stalkers escalate their stalking, and rarely deescalate it. "All Truth passes through Three Stages First, it is Ridiculed… Second, it is Violently Opposed… Third, it is Accepted as being Self-Evident." – Arthur Schopenhauer (1778-1860)
Response:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 02:41:14 GMT, Joe Parsons <j…@yankeemedia.net> wrote: >On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:18:29 +0100, jake <inva…@invalid.com> wrote: >>On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:59:15 GMT, Joe Parsons <j…@yankeemedia.net> >>wrote: >>>Linda, it has now been three and a half days since you wrote lies about me >>>behind my back, and twenty-four hours since I noticed it and called you on them. >>Linda has not been online for two days >I am quite aware of that, Bob. I am also aware that she has been online since I >called her on her sniping.
If you refer to the post in this (AST) group this is incorrect you posted your rebuttal on the 28th, Linda had not posted since the 27th. >Setting that aside for a moment, however, is it your belief that her lies are >somehow mitigated by a temporary absense?
Linda is privy to far more knowledge than I concerning unsolicited emails and whatever other back channel shennanikins may or may not occur. I imagine she would consider you calling her a liar an example of libel, but I have no intention of speaking for her, nor would she wish me to. >>>You have made serious accusations–now either substantiate them, retract them >>>with an apology, or reveal to this portion of the Usenet community just how >>>dishonest and unethical you really are. >>>Your continued silence will infer the third choice. >>You may infer that, in reality there are other reasons for the lack of >>response. >None that I can think of offhand.
Well you are free to disbelieve me, of course, but there are. >Joe Parsons
__ Sorrow is knowledge, those that know the most must mourn the deepest, the tree of knowledge is not the tree of life. -Lord Byron http://www.schizoaffective.org/
Response:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:59:15 GMT, Joe Parsons <j…@yankeemedia.net> wrote: >Linda, it has now been three and a half days since you wrote lies about me >behind my back, and twenty-four hours since I noticed it and called you on them.
Linda has not been online for two days >You have made serious accusations–now either substantiate them, retract them >with an apology, or reveal to this portion of the Usenet community just how >dishonest and unethical you really are. >Your continued silence will infer the third choice.
You may infer that, in reality there are other reasons for the lack of response. >Joe Parsons
– Regimes planted by bayonets do not take root Ronald Reagan
Response:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:18:29 +0100, jake <inva…@invalid.com> wrote: >On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:59:15 GMT, Joe Parsons <j…@yankeemedia.net> >wrote: >>Linda, it has now been three and a half days since you wrote lies about me >>behind my back, and twenty-four hours since I noticed it and called you on them. >Linda has not been online for two days
I am quite aware of that, Bob. I am also aware that she has been online since I called her on her sniping. Setting that aside for a moment, however, is it your belief that her lies are somehow mitigated by a temporary absense? >>You have made serious accusations–now either substantiate them, retract them >>with an apology, or reveal to this portion of the Usenet community just how >>dishonest and unethical you really are. >>Your continued silence will infer the third choice. >You may infer that, in reality there are other reasons for the lack of >response.
None that I can think of offhand. Joe Parsons
Response:
Linda, it has now been three and a half days since you wrote lies about me behind my back, and twenty-four hours since I noticed it and called you on them. You have made serious accusations–now either substantiate them, retract them with an apology, or reveal to this portion of the Usenet community just how dishonest and unethical you really are. Your continued silence will infer the third choice. Joe Parsons
